January 2019

Short thought

Alternative headline for that recent Science piece: "few journals currently working under outcome of plan that aims to transform how journals work".

Short thought

Today has been an eight-hours-straight-dealing-with-emails-and-admin day and I am somewhat shattered.

Short thought

"We will be calling on all institutions to reject this policy and make clear their own position so staff are fully informed about the values of the institutions that employ them". Institutions need to get this in their own codes of practice, now. https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/9920/Allowing-REF-submission-of-redundant-staffs-research-is-a-breach-of-faith-says-UCU

But how do you get around the fact that this will mean divulging sensitive HR data to non-HR staff?

Short thought

Thought about being productive on the flight, then thought, nah, I'll do the crossword instead. Not too bad. A bit rusty. Can't see why 6 down is Elysium.

Short thought

This bin lorry's neon display signalled that it is available to hire in order to convey valentine's wishes to one's paramour. Because nothing says "I love you" like it being lit up on the side of a filthy garbage truck.

Short thought

This morning's marking soundtrack is Secret Squirrels vol. 3

These are anonymously released disco re-edits. It's blatantly Peza, though. :P

Short thought

The old tech support acronym PICNIC (Problem in Chair, Not in Computer) has a whole new resonance when dealing with academic Profs.

Post

A little more on defamation and CC BY

The problem with non-lawyers, like me, speculating on legal matters is that there's a risk of scaremongering or just plain inaccuracy. Not that this really ever stops the practice -- and it won't here. In any case, I wanted to re-state the question that I raised yesterday and that I'd like…

Short thought

I have added to my Plan S response letter: monographs, REF and Plan S, infrastructural support, "time of publication", "quality", repository requirements, publisher deposition, and pursuit of defamation suits for wrongful attribution under CC BY 4.0 https://eve.gd/2019/01/23/additional-points-in-my-plan-s-response/

I think the last of these is what many historians have said for years, but never phrased it in a way that was clear to me: if someone modifies your work, but attributes it to you, in a defamatory way, do you still have legal recourse if you waived moral rights under CC BY 4.0?

Short thought

A friend sent me this passage - Alan Bennett writing about Stewart Lee - this morning and now I'm hoping for a future 45 minute segment on Goffman and Austin the next time I see SL.

Post

Additional points in my Plan S response

Further to my other post earlier this week, I have added the additional points to my response letter to the Plan S implementation guidelines. These centre around monographs (9), REF involvement in Plan S (10), infrastructural support (11), the "time of publication" (12), clarification of the term…

Short thought

Current article with the headline: "poetry sales soar as political millennials search for clarity". The article may have some worth - I haven't had time to read it yet - but the headline is odd. I've never found any clarity in poetry. Beauty & shock & interest, perhaps.

Short thought

Quick informal poll for humanities academics: if you need digital/OCR copies of works for funded projects, would you be interested if there was a service to provide a quote for this for your application? Or do you already know of such services?

Short thought

Could @ImpossibleFoods please, please, please get their stuff out in the UK? It would almost certainly get me to 100% vegetarianism. (I've got a long way towards this from the dedicated carnivore I was years ago...)

Short thought

Read @BobEaglestone's latest in one go on the train home. A persuasive case for literary studies that I hope will be read by many school leavers. Those not already dissuaded by our government's disastrous curricula interference and who still might find pleasure in literature.

Short thought

Rounding off the week by heading to the book launch of /THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY LITERARY FICTION/. @BobEaglestone

Short thought

Today is marking day. Some stunning work here. Really lifts the task beyond the routine when it's such a pleasure to read.

Short thought

An author today on @openlibhums and working with our ace editorial officer @helenksaunders: "This has been one of the best publishing experiences of my career".

Short thought

It's hard to see what could happen now re. Brexit except a no deal exit. I can't see the HoC having enough unity to repeal or extend Article 50 and without action, we just crash out. Really, really terrible.

Short thought

This winter seems to have been brought to you by the ridiculous virus that never gives up. Just when you think it has gone: WHAM, I'M BACK. Everyone I know seems to have it!

Short thought

Parliamentary business this morning:

1) Prime Minster's Question Time
2) A debate on the problems caused by low level letterboxes
3) A debate on confidence in Her Majesty's Government

Short thought

"The DUP has confirmed that it will vote for the government in the no-confidence motion". It's amazing what a billion quid can buy you.

Short thought

As a member of the CHASE doctoral funding consortium, Birkbeck has sponsored industry placements. I just think it's a shame they're not called chasements.

Short thought

Today's reading is another book on which I've cheated before and just read the introduction: Lauren Berlant's /Cruel Optimism/.

Short thought

"Universities should give offers after results day, says study"... Ok. But could you please help us out with some financial certainty then? You made us dependent on student recruitment to survive and we need to know we can pay our staff ASAP in the year... @GordonMarsden

Short thought

Today's reading is really properly getting down to @zara_dinnen's The Digital Banal rather than just the intro to which I've turned before :P

Short thought

Doing the customer feedback survey for St Pancras International Station. The question "what best describes your reason for visiting St Pancras International" has "recommendation from friend or family member" and "convenient location" but not "it's where my train runs from"...

"How do you keep up with what's happening at St Pancras International". "Follow us on Twitter" / "Follow us on Instagram". Who does this stuff and doesn't realise that people visit stations because trains run from them?

Short thought

Spent a lot of this evening working on the new website for the British Association of Contemporary Literary Studies (BACLS) and am pretty pleased with how it's turning out :)

Short thought

Guinea pigs set up a total racket this morning, squeaking their heads off. We rushed in thinking something must be wrong. No. They just wanted the servants to bring their breakfast!

Short thought

Some of the neoliberal-ese language of grants advertised to me is just totally appalling but also incomprehensible. "This aims to strengthen cluster management excellence and facilitate exchanges and strategic partnering between clusters and specialised eco-systems". What?

Short thought

Today I started @roopikarisam's New Digital Worlds. So far, verdict: a must read for anyone who ever thought digital humanities were under theorised but also for those comfortable in thinking that it's "all ok". That's everyone then. Beautifully written, too.

Short thought

It puts the whole thing backwards. Instead of saying that highly flawed and selective schooling lets those from more backgrounds into highly selective universities, consider it the other way around and what the comprehensive university looks like and can do. https://t.co/rshHYoGi3B

(One of my family members failed the 11+ exam. She now has a Ph.D. in neurobiology from Cambridge. Writing children off at 11 is barbaric and doesn't work.)

Short thought

Today I am heading to Egham to speak at Royal Holloway's Technē Congress. I always forget, but my word it's a trek to get there.

Short thought

I love that the Janeway team, in true Trek fashion, doesn't have a "developers meeting", or a "programmers meeting". Oh no. It's the "engineering department meeting" :P

@ajrbyers

Short thought

Today's (re)reading is Amy Hungerford's _Making Literature Now_.

... can you spot the cover design overlap? :)

Short thought

I've just seen an article entitled "make your own distraction-free Twitter interface" and, although I haven't read the piece, I'm not sure the author actually knows what Twitter is.

Short thought

Chronicle article comes in re. academic monographs with subtitle: "For most of us, success isn’t about the sales". Just as well.

Short thought

Today's reading is Nicholas Thoburn's Anti-Book: On the Art and Politics of Radical Publishing.

Short thought

Do you know what's tedious? Being at a neurology appointment instead of at exciting sounding events in Chicago. Oh well, I'd guess it's warmer here!

It is, at least, just a routine appointment. And tedium is preferable in such appointments.

Short thought

Today's reading is Pat Barker. Deep thoughts so far include: there is a lot of rape in this book.

Short thought

The New Year's Day Dr Who Dalek that rebuilt itself from scrap clearly took lessons from the KLF.

Short thought

Although it's a bit of a cheat as I started reading it last year, I'm kicking off 2019 by reading the brilliant and hilarious The Hollywood Meme by @iainrobertsmith

@iainrobertsmith I should note that there's a very serious analytical framework behind the book and how it de/re/centres Hollywood and the political implications of it all. But I just so love reading of the films Iain chooses to write about. They all sound fantastic and, as above, some hilarious.